[Edit] This was longer than I intended, sorry.. If you want to skip reading anything, the middle two paragraphs are basically supporting details leading to the last paragraph.
Throughout the years of English imperialism, the British Empire grew in power as it captured and plundered small, isolated countries. From these countries, many emigrants made their way to England in search of lives different from the ones they had in their home countries; however, upon their arrival, many faced unexpected challenges. The English, along with many other Westerners, held many suspicions toward foreigners which made it hard for immigrants to assimilate into society. Racism and nationalism not only gave natives priority in the work force leaving even skilled foreigners without or in menial jobs, it also held bias in the judicial system, social standing, and education. In The Lost World, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle subtly mirrors this treatment through the behavior of the ape-men toward the plateau Indians and the four explorers.
We talked a bit in class about how the plateau is much similar to the English countryside, mostly on how the same type of trees grew in each place [beech, ginkgo, etc.]. But how else do the two landscapes relate? England, like the plateau, was generally fairly open with a lot of farms and hills with the exception of a central city: London in England and the Ape Town of the plateau. Also, the parallel [as someone mentioned] of the tall ginkgo tree overlooking the plateau and Big Ben overlooking London. This scenery sets up the backdrop for further parallels to arise wish the introduction of the ape-men. From the start, Doyle makes it obvious that these "missing links" have some form of organized militia that works easily amongst the trees, much as the British Navy dominated the oceans of the world. Both had small groups that could hold their own [as the single ape-man so easily escaped the fall from the ginkgo tree] and spy on enemies [inferring that it was an ape-man which stumbled upon and ransacked the adventurers' camp on that first day]; however, both could call upon a massive force to overtake those they desired [as the ape-men easily capture three of the adventurers at a strategically beneficial time of day]. Both societies seem to take similar enjoyments in public spectacles and executions: England with it's hanging of criminals and lectures [which, in Challenger's case, people expected a sort of political hanging] and the ape-men with shoving prisoners off cliffs [which Lord John even admits he finds amusing]. Doyle even goes so far as to have a doppelganger of Professor Challenger, a presumably prominent Englishman, among the ape-men to complete the link.
So, how do the actions of the ape-men say anything about England's imperialism and racism? As one of the main powers of the plateau, much like England in the wider world, the ape-men keep their domain under complete control and seem to know as soon as anything happens within their mini-empire. When a small group of people shows up, apparently with nothing but a thorn fence, food resources, boxes, and funny sticks, the ape-men take the opportunity to capture the men's camp. This action, at first thought, seems to re-secure the ape-men's position in the plateau, as it eliminates a potential threat and increases their resources.
Back in Ape Town, the men are treated in much the same way as immigrants. Lord John and Professor Summerlee, who more closely resemble the rival Indian tribe, are shunned from the society, neglected, and later potentially subjected to death as an enemy [or, at least attempted]. Meanwhile, Challenger, who looks similar in nature though speaks another language, is treated as an Englishman might treat a German or Spaniard: with politeness [as they allow him to share their food and what not] but also with condescension [as the king brushes off Challenger's pleas for Summerlee's life].
Now, how does Doyle predict the consequences of England's current treatment of those it has colonized? Each of imperialistic act of the ape-men seems to take them one step closer to their demise. First, in capturing the four Englishmen, the ape-men treat them in such a way to gain another enemy; but, they also make the mistake of disregarding the power of the guns. Likely because they can not comprehend the technologies of the adventurers, the ape-men leave behind the advancements of those they captured; advances which, had they studied them, could have given them the absolute advantage or, had they discarded them, could not be used against them. This underestimation of the humans' power, and ability to untie knots, comes back to haunt them when Lord John and Malone revolt to save their friends and again when they join forces with the plateau Indians who treat them with respect. This series of events predicts that England's habitual underestimation and belligerent treatment of it's immigrants and colonists may very lead to it's undoing. It is as if Doyle says, "Learn from those you conquer or they may surprise you."
Some other points to ponder:
~ How the actions of the non-white characters [such as Zambo and Indians] towards others compare with the actions of those with some Anglo-Saxon decent [People you meet in England, even the half-breeds].
~ If Doyle is against imperialism, why is the plateau Indians' conquest allowed to succeed? What makes it different, or a more justified outcome?
~ Could, instead, the ape-men represent some other imperialistic power [perhaps Russia, as England was in competition with it at the time. Would fit with the hairiness. :D] which the Indians [as England with their canoes] must overcome.
Just some thoughts,
Marissa Anthony
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow, I think I've finally wrapped my head around this idea. And it's a very thought-provoking idea if I do say so myself. I wasn't in class Monday, but judging from your post I'm guessing y'all talked some about how the plateau and it's scenery and inhabitants relate to England. It's really surprising how much their appearances mirror each other. It's also interesting how England and the plateau's inhabitants reflect each other. Now, I am not too inept on the happenings in and around England during the time that The Lost World was written, but from the information you gave, I can now see the resemblance.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Doyle was subtly trying to tell the English imperialists that treating immigrants the way they were treating them would eventually backfire. You can really see the similarities in the ape-men and Englishmen. Basically to me it sounds like Doyle is saying, "English imperialists are uncivilized apes that need to learn from and be friendly to others rather than conquer and capture them."
I'm not too sure about the racism thing though. I think it mostly falls in with the imperialist topic, but once again, I'm not too knowledgeable about England during that particular time.
These are very insightful points, as well as thought-provoking. One thing that Marissa said that caught my attention was when she mentioned the Ape-men's disregard for the danger of the guns and for their treatment of the Englishmen. While this was probably not intentional on Doyle's part, it made me think of the Revolutionary War and how it is similar to the war between the Indians and the Ape-men. In the revolutionary war, the English underestimated the power of the American people, as well as France who aided America (much like the four adventurers aided the Indians). England made an enemy of France, which may have been what cost them the war. Similarly in the novel, the Indians are able to overcome the Ape-men with the help of the four explorers. In this way the actions of the Ape-men reflect England's imperialism in more than just a general sense, but a particular case as well. While this may seem like a stretch, it was something that caught my attention.
ReplyDeleteWhile the similarities regarding the imperialism of England and the Ape-men seems somewhat obvious, I believe its a lesson lost on our explorers. These four men (perhaps with the exception of Roxton) are here to uncover this lost world, and as a result kind of "dominate" it to use for their own purposes. Even after they help defeat the Ape-men, the idea that maybe conquering this lost world could be harmful is far from their minds. On page 201, right after Malone and Lord John free Summerlee and Challenger, Challenger says, "Not only we as individuals, but European science collectively, owe you a debt of gratitude for what you have done. I do not hesitate to say that the disappearance of Professor Summerlee and myself would have left an appreciable gap in modern zoological history." This shows that the four Englishmen do not make the connection between the dominance of the Ape-men, and the scientific imperialism of England or "European science."
We certainly have a very powerful thinking group here...haha. To start off, I'd like to respond back to what Marissa started the Blog off with. Though I have to agree with what Lauren said regarding knowledge, or the lack thereof, about England at the time of the novel's debut, the fact that you had so many references to events and so much evidence to defend your point was hard to shy away from. I have to say though, your initial argument was questionable. You said that the Ape-men could be compared to England in the idea that they were prejudice against strangers, but couldn't you find an example of that behavior in almost any remote setting? The Ape-men were used to being in control of the Plateau, but being the highest known life-forms, or most acclimated to that environment, somewhat made that an obvious fact. Yes, they were rather barbaric and bias against organisms that were not like them, but their actions were natural--basic, if that makes sense. They are very "base" and maybe couldn't help themselves when it came to being boorish and threatened by men they did not understand. I do see what you are saying concerning imagery of imperialism and racism throughout the work, but that one point in particular caught my attention.
ReplyDeleteConor, what you said assessing the parallels between the Plateau War and the Revolutionary War was interesting. I think you actually kind of emphasized my point--regarding finding examples in almost any situation that dealt with strangers and their exposure to native cultures. Your point about being kicked in the butt by underestimating someone and their power, along with Marissa's comment, was very interesting. Situations like that occur so often, but do we ourselves actually learn from our mistakes?
Go Orange Team!
Cara-Joy
Well I have to start off saying that I don't think there is much for me to say regarding the ideas that have been thrown out there, but everyone does bring up some pretty interesting points. I have to agree with Cara-Joy that the actions of the Ape-men were natural though they are seen as barbaric. They treat the white men as outsiders, just at the British Imperialists would.
ReplyDeleteEveryone makes good points, but I think we are all missing a key element of the novel. The adventure and thrill we get from reading the novel almost takes away from the very reason that Dr. Tiff has us reading it. Throughout the novel we see examples and parallels to British Imperialism but we have neglected to discuss how it relates to science. We have seen throughout history that scientific progress is mainly done by those who explore and question others ideas. The British were clearly one of the most developed countries around this time. Challengers expedition can be seen as this scientific progress the we have all seen in British Imperialism.
Well I think this makes sense or some of it does. I can tell we will have some pretty intense discussions in this group just from looking at this first blog.
Matt Meister
I have to agree with Matt in saying that we are getting away from how the novel relates to science. Although I did not elaborate too clearly in my last paragraph, it is very similar to the point that Matt brought up about scientific progress: that these men use science as a tool to in a sense dominate this "lost world" for their own purposes. Furthermore the men cling to a sort of Scientific Imperialism to justify their uncovering of a new land, despite the effects it may have on its well-being. In this sense it almost seems as if scientific progress is somewhat destructive in nature.
ReplyDelete